WTI Crude--
Brent Crude--
Natural Gas--
ND Rig Count--
WTI Crude--
Brent Crude--
Natural Gas--
ND Rig Count--
Pipeline & Infrastructure

Decade Since DAPL Protests Began, Standing Rock Flashpoint Remembered

The 2016 Dakota Access Pipeline protests, a pivotal conflict pitting energy development against tribal sovereignty, reached a critical escalation in early September ten years ago.

Bakken Wire Staff·☀️Morning Wire·

The world’s attention turned to North Dakota in early September 2016 as protests over the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) intensified into a major standoff, according to a report from the Williston Herald. The conflict began after the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers approved plans for the $3.7 billion crude oil pipeline half a mile outside the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation.

The decision pitted American energy interests against tribal sovereignty, according to the source. It sparked a grassroots movement where Indigenous protesters and allies argued the project threatened water, sacred sites, and the environment. Pipeline developers and state officials maintained that modern steel pipelines offered safer fossil-fuel transit than railroads or trucks.

Thousands of Native Americans and climate activists flocked to the protest camps south of Bismarck. Public figures, including actors Shailene Woodley and Mark Ruffalo and the Rev. Jesse Jackson, arrived to show support. Activists employed various tactics, chaining themselves to equipment, building resistance hubs, holding prayer runs, and blocking roads, which reportedly began costing Dakota Access Partners $83.3 million per month.

Environmental groups like Greenpeace supplied activists with assistance including tents, solar-powered vehicles, cameras, and training, the Williston Herald reported. While activists such as Winona LaDuke and then-Standing Rock Sioux Chairman Dave Archambault II focused on environmental and cultural concerns, Energy Transfer Partners was concerned with pipeline integrity, worker safety, and project budgets.

Before September 2016, protests were comparatively calm, with 37 arrests primarily for trespassing and disorderly conduct. However, by September 3, the situation changed dramatically as protester numbers threatened to overwhelm law enforcement responses. The standoff became a defining event for Bakken infrastructure, highlighting the complex social, legal, and political challenges surrounding major pipeline projects critical to moving the region's oil to market.

Source

Williston Herald (Bing News) published September 4, 2026.

dakota access pipelinedaplstanding rockprotestsinfrastructureenergy transfer partnersbakken

Share this article

Related Articles

Pipeline & Infrastructure

New DAPL Lawsuit Draws Criticism as Bakken Operators Monitor Threat

A new legal effort to shut down the Dakota Access Pipeline is drawing scrutiny in North Dakota, where the line is described in an InForum opinion column as "a vital piece of infrastructure serving North Dakota's oil and gas industry." The column, published Oct. 12 and carried by Bing News, centered on a press release from Standing Rock Sioux Tribal Chairman Steve Sitting Bear announcing litigation against the pipeline. According to the column, Sitting Bear said, "For ten years, Standing Rock’s concerns about this pipeline have not changed, and for ten years we have fought to protect our water, our Treaty rights, and our people." He added, "The Army Corps has now chosen to move forward without addressing those concerns. Until this pipeline is shut down, we will continue to defend what generations before us protected for our children." The column argued the statement reflects "the political absurdity" of the...

☀️Morning Wire·Oct 14
Pipeline & Infrastructure

Standing Rock Files New Lawsuit to Shut Down Dakota Access Pipeline

The Standing Rock Sioux Tribe has filed new litigation aiming to shut down the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL), a critical conduit for Bakken crude, according to a press release from Tribal Chairman Steve Sitting Bear. The lawsuit argues that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has moved forward without addressing the tribe's longstanding concerns about water safety and treaty rights, a source reported. "For ten years, Standing Rock’s concerns about this pipeline have not changed, and for ten years we have fought to protect our water, our Treaty rights, and our people," Chairman Sitting Bear said in the release. "Until this pipeline is shut down, we will continue to defend what generations before us protected for our children." This legal action comes despite the pipeline having operated since 2017. A source noted that the pipeline has been delivering oil for 3,428 days as of the writing of its article, routed...

☀️Morning Wire·Oct 13
Pipeline & Infrastructure

Standing Rock Files New Lawsuit Seeking to Shut Down Dakota Access Pipeline

The Standing Rock Sioux Tribe has filed new litigation aimed at shutting down the Dakota Access Pipeline, reigniting a legal battle over the crucial conduit for Bakken oil. Tribal Chairman Steve Sitting Bear announced the lawsuit, stating the Army Corps of Engineers has moved forward without addressing the tribe's longstanding concerns. “For ten years, Standing Rock’s concerns about this pipeline have not changed, and for ten years we have fought to protect our water, our Treaty rights, and our people,” Sitting Bear said in a press release. “Until this pipeline is shut down, we will continue to defend what generations before us protected for our children.” The lawsuit challenges the federal easement granted earlier this year for the pipeline to cross the Missouri River upstream from the Lake Oahe reservoir. Chairman Sitting Bear stated, “We should not have to live with unanswered questions about the safety of our water.” This...

🌅Afternoon Wire·Oct 12