WTI Crude--
Brent Crude--
Natural Gas--
ND Rig Count--
WTI Crude--
Brent Crude--
Natural Gas--
ND Rig Count--
BAKKEN WIRE
Feds Pay North Dakota $28M Settlement Over DAPL Protest Costs - Bakken Wire
Pipeline & Infrastructure

Feds Pay North Dakota $28M Settlement Over DAPL Protest Costs

The state receives compensation for law enforcement and legal expenses incurred during the 2016-2017 pipeline protests, closing a seven-year legal battle.

Bakken Wire Staff·☀️Morning Wire·

North Dakota will receive $28 million from the federal government to cover costs from the Dakota Access Pipeline protests, according to a settlement announced Thursday. The payment resolves a nearly seven-year lawsuit and matches an award previously granted by a federal judge in 2025.

The state's lawsuit, filed in 2019, alleged that the federal government unlawfully allowed demonstrators to camp on U.S. Army Corps-managed land during the 2016 and 2017 protests in rural south-central North Dakota, causing the demonstrations to grow. As part of the settlement, the U.S. Department of Justice issued a statement acknowledging shortcomings by the Obama administration.

"While the United States continues to disagree with the district court’s legal findings in this case, it acknowledges in hindsight that, under the Obama Administration, the federal government could have done more to reduce the impacts to the people of North Dakota from the Dakota Access Pipeline protests," the Department of Justice stated Thursday. The agency also noted some protesters engaged in unlawful and violent behavior, but said the choice not to forcibly remove them from federal property was made "to avoid further escalation."

North Dakota Attorney General Drew Wrigley said the state sought the formal statement as a public acknowledgement of federal wrongdoing. “An important chapter in our state’s history has been rendered indisputable and closed,” Wrigley said at a Capitol press conference Thursday. His office noted the settlement covers nearly $7.5 million in state legal fees.

The settlement ends the litigation by having the United States dismiss its appeal of the 2025 judgment from U.S. District Court Judge Dan Traynor. As a condition, the parties asked Judge Traynor to void his 120-page ruling and three other orders against the federal government. The Department of Justice maintained its actions were taken for safety reasons, but recognized the "painful consequences for North Dakota and many of its residents."

The Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) is a critical piece of infrastructure for moving Bakken crude oil to market. The prolonged protests, which centered on the pipeline's crossing near the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation, created significant operational uncertainty for Bakken operators and led to massive state law enforcement expenditures. This financial recovery directly compensates North Dakota taxpayers for those costs.

Wrigley emphasized the settlement prevents both sides from spending more public money on further litigation. The federal payment provides fiscal closure for the state on a defining event that disrupted oil and gas operations and strained local resources in the heart of the Bakken region.

Source

Bing News

dakota access pipelinedapllitigationfederal governmentprotestssettlementinfrastructurenorth dakota

Share this article

PostShareShareEmail

Related Articles

Pipeline & Infrastructure

Standing Rock Pipeline Protests Reached Critical Flashpoint 10 Years Ago

The protest movement against the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) reached a major flashpoint in early September 2016, drawing thousands to the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation and igniting a national debate over energy and tribal rights. According to a report from the North Dakota Monitor via Bing News, the conflict intensified after the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers approved plans for the $3.7 billion crude oil pipeline to run half a mile outside the reservation. The project created a stark confrontation between American energy infrastructure and tribal sovereignty. Pipeline developers and state officials argued that modern steel pipelines offered safer fossil-fuel transit than railroads or trucks. Meanwhile, the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, led by then-Chairman Dave Archambault II, and allies contended the pipeline threatened water sources, sacred sites, and the environment. What began as a smaller protest swelled into a major encampment on the plains south of Bismarck. Thousands of Indigenous...

🌅Afternoon Wire·Sep 5
Pipeline & Infrastructure

Decade Since DAPL Protests Began, Standing Rock Flashpoint Remembered

The world’s attention turned to North Dakota in early September 2016 as protests over the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) intensified into a major standoff, according to a report from the Williston Herald. The conflict began after the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers approved plans for the $3.7 billion crude oil pipeline half a mile outside the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation. The decision pitted American energy interests against tribal sovereignty, according to the source. It sparked a grassroots movement where Indigenous protesters and allies argued the project threatened water, sacred sites, and the environment. Pipeline developers and state officials maintained that modern steel pipelines offered safer fossil-fuel transit than railroads or trucks. Thousands of Native Americans and climate activists flocked to the protest camps south of Bismarck. Public figures, including actors Shailene Woodley and Mark Ruffalo and the Rev. Jesse Jackson, arrived to show support. Activists employed various tactics, chaining themselves...

☀️Morning Wire·Sep 5
Pipeline & Infrastructure

DAPL Protests Reached Critical Flashpoint 10 Years Ago This Week

The protest movement against the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) reached a major flashpoint ten years ago this week, according to a historical report. The $3.7 billion crude oil pipeline project, designed to transport Bakken oil, became a global symbol of conflict between energy development and Indigenous rights. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' approval of the pipeline's path half a mile outside the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation in early September 2016 ignited the intensified standoff. The Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, led by then-Chairman Dave Archambault II, argued the project threatened water sources, sacred sites, and the environment. The protest rapidly grew from a localized issue to a major gathering. Thousands of Indigenous people and allies from around the world flocked to the camp south of Bismarck. Public figures including actors Shailene Woodley and Mark Ruffalo and the Rev. Jesse Jackson arrived to show support, according to the report. The movement...

🌅Afternoon Wire·Sep 4