WTI Crude--
Brent Crude--
Natural Gas--
ND Rig Count--
WTI Crude--
Brent Crude--
Natural Gas--
ND Rig Count--
BAKKEN WIRE
North Dakota Secures Final $27.8M Federal Payment for DAPL Protest Costs - Bakken Wire
Pipeline & Infrastructure

North Dakota Secures Final $27.8M Federal Payment for DAPL Protest Costs

The Trump administration settlement brings the state's total recovery to nearly $38 million for expenses incurred during the 2016-17 pipeline protests.

Bakken Wire Staff·🔆Midday Wire·

North Dakota has secured a final $27.8 million payment from the federal government to cover costs from the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) protests, according to an announcement by state Attorney General Drew Wrigley. Combined with a previous $10 million payment, the state's total recovery now amounts to nearly $38 million.

The settlement resolves a long-running lawsuit where North Dakota sought reimbursement for law enforcement, emergency response, and cleanup costs stemming from the massive demonstrations near the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation. The protests, which drew international attention, opposed the pipeline's construction over concerns it threatened tribal water supplies and sacred sites.

State officials argued that North Dakota taxpayers should not bear the financial burden of the response. According to state data cited in the report, the emergency response lasted more than 230 days and involved 178 agencies from multiple counties. Authorities made 761 arrests during the protests, 709 of which involved individuals from outside North Dakota.

The protests began on April 1, 2016, with the establishment of the Sacred Stone Camp. The movement grew into one of the largest Indigenous-led actions in modern history. In December 2016, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers initially denied a key easement for the pipeline to cross under Lake Oahe. That decision was reversed after President Donald Trump took office and directed the Corps to expedite the project. Remaining protest camps were cleared by late February 2017.

Attorney General Wrigley credited the work of his office and former Attorney General Wayne Stenehjem, who pursued the reimbursement before his death in 2022. The settlement represents the conclusion of the state's financial claim related to the nearly 10-month event.

For Bakken operators and the state's oil industry, the DAPL pipeline remains a critical piece of infrastructure. The pipeline transports crude oil from the Bakken formation in North Dakota to Illinois. Despite the intense opposition, it was completed and entered service in 2017 and has continued operating since.

The financial recovery closes a significant chapter of fiscal impact from the protests for North Dakota. The state's successful reimbursement claim underscores the substantial public resources deployed during the period of civil disobedience focused on a key Bakken export route.

Source

Bing News

dakota access pipelinedaplpipelineprotestsnorth dakotasettlementlaw enforcementbakken

Share this article

PostShareShareEmail

Related Articles

Standing Rock Pipeline Protests Mark 10-Year Anniversary, Recalling 2016 Flashpoint - Bakken Wire
Pipeline & Infrastructure

Standing Rock Pipeline Protests Mark 10-Year Anniversary, Recalling 2016 Flashpoint

The protests over the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) reached a critical flashpoint in early September 2016, an event marking its 10-year anniversary this week, according to a report from the North Dakota Monitor. The $3.7 billion crude oil pipeline project ignited a months-long conflict after the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers approved its route half a mile outside the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation. The decision framed a national debate pitting American energy infrastructure against tribal sovereignty and environmental concerns. While developers and state officials argued modern steel pipelines were safer for fossil-fuel transit than railroads or trucks, the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and a growing movement of allies contended the project threatened water sources, sacred sites, and the environment. What began as a smaller protest swelled into a major encampment south of Bismarck, drawing thousands of Indigenous people and activists from around the world. High-profile supporters, including actors Shailene Woodley...

🔆Midday Wire·Sep 6
Pipeline & Infrastructure

Decade Since DAPL Protests Began, Standing Rock Flashpoint Remembered

This week marks ten years since protests over the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) intensified into a major conflict at the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation in North Dakota. According to a report from the Williston Herald, the world's attention turned to the state in early September 2016 after the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers approved plans for the $3.7 billion crude oil pipeline half a mile outside the reservation. The decision sparked a months-long standoff that pitted American energy development against tribal sovereignty. A grassroots movement of Indigenous protesters and allies from around the world argued the project threatened water supplies, sacred tribal sites, and the environment. Developers and state officials, meanwhile, maintained that modern steel pipelines offered safer fossil-fuel transit than railroads or trucks. Thousands of people, including Native Americans and climate activists, flocked to the plains south of Bismarck. Their numbers grew to the point of threatening to overwhelm...

☀️Morning Wire·Sep 6
Pipeline & Infrastructure

Standing Rock Pipeline Protests Reached Critical Flashpoint 10 Years Ago

The protest movement against the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) reached a major flashpoint in early September 2016, drawing thousands to the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation and igniting a national debate over energy and tribal rights. According to a report from the North Dakota Monitor via Bing News, the conflict intensified after the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers approved plans for the $3.7 billion crude oil pipeline to run half a mile outside the reservation. The project created a stark confrontation between American energy infrastructure and tribal sovereignty. Pipeline developers and state officials argued that modern steel pipelines offered safer fossil-fuel transit than railroads or trucks. Meanwhile, the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, led by then-Chairman Dave Archambault II, and allies contended the pipeline threatened water sources, sacred sites, and the environment. What began as a smaller protest swelled into a major encampment on the plains south of Bismarck. Thousands of Indigenous...

🌅Afternoon Wire·Sep 5