
Upstream M&A Slows in Q2 as Midstream, Global Markets Show Strength
Enverus reports deal slowdown, while Phillips 66 profits rise and Hormuz volatility persists.
U.S. upstream merger and acquisition activity slowed in the second quarter of 2026, according to a new report from Enverus Intelligence Research. The analysis, reported by Rigzone, indicates a cooling period for corporate consolidation and asset deals among oil and gas producers.
For Bakken operators, a slowdown in M&A can signal a period of operational focus and capital discipline over aggressive portfolio expansion. It may reflect a more cautious approach to deal-making amid evolving commodity price forecasts and regulatory landscapes specific to the Williston Basin.
In related energy sector news, refining and midstream giant Phillips 66 posted a significant profit increase. Rigzone reported the company saw rises in refining margins, plant utilization, and natural gas liquids (NGL) pipeline and fractionation volumes. Strong NGL infrastructure performance is a positive signal for Bakken producers, whose output often includes valuable NGLs that require transportation and processing.
Meanwhile, global crude oil markets continue to navigate geopolitical tensions. The S&P Global Energy Crude Oil Markets team noted that through recent turmoil in the Strait of Hormuz, one constant has persisted, as outlined by Rigzone. While the specific constant was not detailed in the summary, such ongoing volatility underscores the interconnectedness of global oil prices and Bakken crude economics, which are benchmarked against international grades.
Together, these developments paint a picture of a domestic industry where upstream consolidation may be pausing, while midstream and downstream segments capture value. For North Dakota, the health of integrated midstream networks remains critical for moving Bakken crude and NGLs to market efficiently, especially as global supply routes face persistent risks.
Source
Rigzone (Enverus Intelligence Research report, Phillips 66 earnings, S&P Global Energy analysis)


