WTI Crude--
Brent Crude--
Natural Gas--
ND Rig Count--
WTI Crude--
Brent Crude--
Natural Gas--
ND Rig Count--
Standing Rock Pipeline Protests Mark 10-Year Anniversary, Recalling 2016 Flashpoint - Bakken Wire
Pipeline & Infrastructure

Standing Rock Pipeline Protests Mark 10-Year Anniversary, Recalling 2016 Flashpoint

The Dakota Access Pipeline conflict, which began a decade ago, escalated in early September 2016, pitting energy development against tribal sovereignty and drawing global attention to North Dakota.

Bakken Wire Staff·🔆Midday Wire·

The protests over the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) reached a critical flashpoint in early September 2016, an event marking its 10-year anniversary this week, according to a report from the North Dakota Monitor. The $3.7 billion crude oil pipeline project ignited a months-long conflict after the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers approved its route half a mile outside the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation.

The decision framed a national debate pitting American energy infrastructure against tribal sovereignty and environmental concerns. While developers and state officials argued modern steel pipelines were safer for fossil-fuel transit than railroads or trucks, the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and a growing movement of allies contended the project threatened water sources, sacred sites, and the environment.

What began as a smaller protest swelled into a major encampment south of Bismarck, drawing thousands of Indigenous people and activists from around the world. High-profile supporters, including actors Shailene Woodley and Mark Ruffalo and the Rev. Jesse Jackson, traveled to North Dakota to join the cause. Protesters employed various tactics, including chaining themselves to equipment, building resistance hubs, holding prayer runs, and blocking roads.

The escalating activism began to significantly impact the project's bottom line. According to the report, the protests were costing Dakota Access Partners an estimated $83.3 million per month in delays and damaged equipment. Environmental groups like Greenpeace provided logistical support to activists, including tents, solar-powered vehicles, and training.

Key voices in the opposition included then-Standing Rock Sioux Reservation Chairman Dave Archambault II and Ojibwe writer and economist Winona LaDuke, who focused on water protection and Indigenous rights. Meanwhile, pipeline developer Energy Transfer Partners expressed growing concerns over pipeline integrity, worker safety, and project budgets.

Law enforcement responses intensified as protester numbers grew. Before September 2016, arrests were relatively limited, with 37 people primarily charged with trespassing and disorderly conduct. However, the situation changed dramatically in early September, with the protests threatening to overwhelm authorities and bringing unprecedented international scrutiny to North Dakota's energy sector.

The anniversary underscores the complex intersection of energy infrastructure, regulatory approval, and tribal rights that continues to resonate for Bakken operators and communities in North Dakota. The Dakota Access Pipeline remains a key conduit for Bakken crude oil to market.

Source

North Dakota Monitor (Bing News)

dakota access pipelinedaplstanding rockprotestsinfrastructureenergy transfer partnerstribal sovereigntynorth dakota

Share this article

Related Articles

Pipeline & Infrastructure

New DAPL Lawsuit Draws Criticism as Bakken Operators Monitor Threat

A new legal effort to shut down the Dakota Access Pipeline is drawing scrutiny in North Dakota, where the line is described in an InForum opinion column as "a vital piece of infrastructure serving North Dakota's oil and gas industry." The column, published Oct. 12 and carried by Bing News, centered on a press release from Standing Rock Sioux Tribal Chairman Steve Sitting Bear announcing litigation against the pipeline. According to the column, Sitting Bear said, "For ten years, Standing Rock’s concerns about this pipeline have not changed, and for ten years we have fought to protect our water, our Treaty rights, and our people." He added, "The Army Corps has now chosen to move forward without addressing those concerns. Until this pipeline is shut down, we will continue to defend what generations before us protected for our children." The column argued the statement reflects "the political absurdity" of the...

☀️Morning Wire·Oct 14
Pipeline & Infrastructure

Standing Rock Files New Lawsuit to Shut Down Dakota Access Pipeline

The Standing Rock Sioux Tribe has filed new litigation aiming to shut down the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL), a critical conduit for Bakken crude, according to a press release from Tribal Chairman Steve Sitting Bear. The lawsuit argues that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has moved forward without addressing the tribe's longstanding concerns about water safety and treaty rights, a source reported. "For ten years, Standing Rock’s concerns about this pipeline have not changed, and for ten years we have fought to protect our water, our Treaty rights, and our people," Chairman Sitting Bear said in the release. "Until this pipeline is shut down, we will continue to defend what generations before us protected for our children." This legal action comes despite the pipeline having operated since 2017. A source noted that the pipeline has been delivering oil for 3,428 days as of the writing of its article, routed...

☀️Morning Wire·Oct 13
Pipeline & Infrastructure

Standing Rock Files New Lawsuit Seeking to Shut Down Dakota Access Pipeline

The Standing Rock Sioux Tribe has filed new litigation aimed at shutting down the Dakota Access Pipeline, reigniting a legal battle over the crucial conduit for Bakken oil. Tribal Chairman Steve Sitting Bear announced the lawsuit, stating the Army Corps of Engineers has moved forward without addressing the tribe's longstanding concerns. “For ten years, Standing Rock’s concerns about this pipeline have not changed, and for ten years we have fought to protect our water, our Treaty rights, and our people,” Sitting Bear said in a press release. “Until this pipeline is shut down, we will continue to defend what generations before us protected for our children.” The lawsuit challenges the federal easement granted earlier this year for the pipeline to cross the Missouri River upstream from the Lake Oahe reservoir. Chairman Sitting Bear stated, “We should not have to live with unanswered questions about the safety of our water.” This...

🌅Afternoon Wire·Oct 12