WTI Crude--
Brent Crude--
Natural Gas--
ND Rig Count--
WTI Crude--
Brent Crude--
Natural Gas--
ND Rig Count--
BAKKEN WIRE
Ugandan Farmers Sue in UK Court to Block Near-Completed $5B EACOP Pipeline - Bakken Wire
Pipeline & Infrastructure

Ugandan Farmers Sue in UK Court to Block Near-Completed $5B EACOP Pipeline

A legal challenge against TotalEnergies-led project highlights global environmental litigation risks for pipeline infrastructure.

Bakken Wire Staff·🔆Midday Wire·

A group of Ugandan farmers filed a case in the UK High Court on Tuesday seeking to halt the nearly completed $5 billion East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP), according to a report from OilPrice.com. The lawsuit, targeting developer EACOP Ltd., underscores the persistent legal and environmental challenges facing major pipeline projects worldwide, a context Bakken operators monitor closely.

The 1,443-kilometer pipeline, led by French supermajor TotalEnergies, is designed to transport crude from Uganda’s Albertine Graben to the port of Tanga in Tanzania. According to OilPrice.com, the pipeline could be completed as soon as this month, with first shipments expected late this year or in early 2027. It is designed to carry up to 246,000 barrels per day, enabling Uganda's first oil exports from the Tilenga and Kingfisher fields.

The plaintiffs, represented by law firm Leigh Day, contend the pipeline and associated oil production would harm local water resources, wildlife, and biodiversity. Their petition, cited by Bloomberg, seeks an injunction to stop oil transportation and compensation under Ugandan law. The farmers hope a successful lawsuit could stop the pipeline from becoming operational, with remedies that "could go to the heart of the project’s commercial viability," OilPrice.com reported.

For Bakken operators and North Dakota's energy sector, the case is a high-profile example of the legal and environmental scrutiny that can delay or threaten critical midstream infrastructure. While the EACOP project is geographically distant, similar legal strategies based on environmental impact have been employed against pipeline projects in the United States. The case highlights the operational and financial risks for developers when projects face last-minute judicial challenges, even after years of construction and investment.

Supporters of EACOP argue the project is transformative for East Africa, promising job creation, infrastructure investment, and enhanced regional energy security. The pipeline's capacity of 216,000 barrels per day, ramping up to 246,000 bpd, is intended to handle peak production from the Albertine Rift Basin, which is expected to reach around 200,000 bpd. The outcome of this UK court case will be watched by the international energy industry as a test of legal leverage against near-finished projects.

Source

OilPrice.com

pipelineinfrastructurelitigationtotalenergieseacopenvironmentexportsuganda

Share this article

PostShareShareEmail

Related Articles

Standing Rock Pipeline Protests Mark 10-Year Anniversary, Recalling 2016 Flashpoint - Bakken Wire
Pipeline & Infrastructure

Standing Rock Pipeline Protests Mark 10-Year Anniversary, Recalling 2016 Flashpoint

The protests over the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) reached a critical flashpoint in early September 2016, an event marking its 10-year anniversary this week, according to a report from the North Dakota Monitor. The $3.7 billion crude oil pipeline project ignited a months-long conflict after the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers approved its route half a mile outside the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation. The decision framed a national debate pitting American energy infrastructure against tribal sovereignty and environmental concerns. While developers and state officials argued modern steel pipelines were safer for fossil-fuel transit than railroads or trucks, the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and a growing movement of allies contended the project threatened water sources, sacred sites, and the environment. What began as a smaller protest swelled into a major encampment south of Bismarck, drawing thousands of Indigenous people and activists from around the world. High-profile supporters, including actors Shailene Woodley...

🔆Midday Wire·Sep 6
Pipeline & Infrastructure

Decade Since DAPL Protests Began, Standing Rock Flashpoint Remembered

This week marks ten years since protests over the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) intensified into a major conflict at the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation in North Dakota. According to a report from the Williston Herald, the world's attention turned to the state in early September 2016 after the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers approved plans for the $3.7 billion crude oil pipeline half a mile outside the reservation. The decision sparked a months-long standoff that pitted American energy development against tribal sovereignty. A grassroots movement of Indigenous protesters and allies from around the world argued the project threatened water supplies, sacred tribal sites, and the environment. Developers and state officials, meanwhile, maintained that modern steel pipelines offered safer fossil-fuel transit than railroads or trucks. Thousands of people, including Native Americans and climate activists, flocked to the plains south of Bismarck. Their numbers grew to the point of threatening to overwhelm...

☀️Morning Wire·Sep 6
Pipeline & Infrastructure

Standing Rock Pipeline Protests Reached Critical Flashpoint 10 Years Ago

The protest movement against the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) reached a major flashpoint in early September 2016, drawing thousands to the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation and igniting a national debate over energy and tribal rights. According to a report from the North Dakota Monitor via Bing News, the conflict intensified after the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers approved plans for the $3.7 billion crude oil pipeline to run half a mile outside the reservation. The project created a stark confrontation between American energy infrastructure and tribal sovereignty. Pipeline developers and state officials argued that modern steel pipelines offered safer fossil-fuel transit than railroads or trucks. Meanwhile, the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, led by then-Chairman Dave Archambault II, and allies contended the pipeline threatened water sources, sacred sites, and the environment. What began as a smaller protest swelled into a major encampment on the plains south of Bismarck. Thousands of Indigenous...

🌅Afternoon Wire·Sep 5